Skip to content

Blogtastisch: 2. Blogs und das Fediverse

notizBlog
17 8 144

Diese Artikel könnten Dich auch interessieren.

  • 0 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    PewDiePie built his fame and fortune on a centralized platform. I am not certain whether he will see the benefit of a decentralized future beyond dollar signs. Happy to be proven wrong.
  • Organizers Log:

    Uncategorized deso fedicon fediorigami fediverse
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    reiver@mastodon.social that's the first time I've seen the FediOrigami logo, looks neat!
  • 0 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    pfefferle@mastodon.social only one way to find out
  • Unicode in handles

    ActivityPub unicode activitypub
    15
    0 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    67 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    לאצי the usernames work fine locally (that is, on the site itself). It's when interoperating with other sites not running NodeBB where there are issues, it seems
  • I wrote a #FEP about actor statuses.

    Uncategorized fep activitypub
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Man!!! That screenshot takes me back..
  • 0 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    33 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    feditips@social.growyourown.services ahaldorsen@tutoteket.no feel free to reach out if you have trouble setting up or administering NodeBB. We're on the fediverse, and happy to be here!
  • 0 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    112 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey rimu@piefed.social thanks for responding (and sorry for the late reply!) I am not married to the Announce([Article|Note|Page]) approach, so I am definitely open to Create([Article|Note|Page]) with a back-reference. I think I went the former direction because there is a known fallback mechanism — the Announce is treated as a share/boost/repost as normal. However, sending the Create also is fine I think. However, do we need a backreference? In my limited research, it seems that Piefed, et al. picks the first Group actor and associates the post with that community. If I sent over a Create(Article) with two Group actors addressed, could Piefed associate the post with the first, and initiate a cross-post with the remaining Group actors? Secondly, is how to handle sync. 1b12 relies on communities having reciprocal followers in order for two-way synchronization to be established. On my end since I know it is cross-posted I will now send 1b12 activities to cross-posted communities, but can Piefed, et al. send 1b12 activities back as well, in the absence of followers? cc andrew_s@piefed.social nutomic@lemmy.ml melroy@kbin.melroy.org bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de
  • Post flair in PieFed

    Fediverse fediverse
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    I think the FEP process is overly complicated for what it is, but it's definitely helpful if you have multiple implementors on board. The easiest (but least accessible) solution is to document something on your own site, but that lacks the social proof that a finalized FEP has. Just some food for thought I'm looking to create an FEP for cross posting and would love to get the entire threadiverse dev community involved.