Radforum Düsseldorf

occultist8128@infosec.pub "followers only" is a concept that is Mastodon specific, and Pixelfed supports it. There's nothing to change at the protocol level itself. Sending the reply to OP in your example would be a betrayal of the visibility of followers only... which is kind of silly but technically correct. Better would be followers + participants, but that's up to the individual implementors to adopt.

deadsuperhero@social.wedistribute.org I'm of the opinion that a solid collection of links is the easiest way to get there. FediDevs set out to do that but I think the best approach would be to update ActivityPub.rocks with the links and docs instead. Join the WG for it!! Led by evan@cosocial.ca and j12t@j12t.social

pumpkindrama@reddthat.com NodeBB supports topic based following, because it's a forum and that's literally how it was done way back then. You can follow tags as well.

benpate@mastodon.social honestly whatever you ramble on about is always a good show. Stoked you're presenting!

silverpill@mitra.social I wasn't aware that there were sections pertaining to context. I'll have to review more closely.

box464@mastodon.social we're thrilled to have been funded for another round! There's a lot we want to accomplish and we'll be working on our milestone list in the coming weeks. Context discovery is just one exciting thing we have planned!

tchambers@indieweb.social this, in a nutshell. The fediverse vid AP can support both A and B, and we can wax poetic about how one is superior to the other but both are legitimate UX decisions by their respective software stacks. I prefer B myself, of course. cc tommi@pan.rent j12t@j12t.social

Tell me about it! There are some very cool people (i.e. thisismissem@hachyderm.io) working on content classification and tagging so that the burden of filtering out this kind of content isn't borne by server admins directly.

snoopy@jlai.lu personally, since I create AP enabled software I am on the side of votes being public data. We already have enough issues with votes being out of sync with each other. Mixing in private voting is just asking for trouble. Emoji reactions are neat, although niche to those softwares that utilise it. They allow for greater expression which is nice. They're useless for deriving value (for ranking purposes) unless you assign value to them.

liaizon@social.wake.st are the long emoji horizontal or vertical? The former is easier to support (setting just a max height), but the latter has concerns re: line height. cc silverpill@mitra.social

NodeBB is gearing up for a major release this month that brings full two way federation and content discoverability to forums as well! We've been working on it all last year! @activitypub