mattl@social.coop for what it's worth, as a speaker, I do not mind my presentation being upload onto YouTube. cc reiver@mastodon.social

benpate@mastodon.social I think the second half of evan@cosocial.ca's FEP utilizes the ActivityPub API (C2S) as written.

rolle@mementomori.social I'm sorry this happened to you. It's so easy to hurl hurtful accusations with no accountability that one ought to treat them as you would treat drive by criticisms. I'm pretty far down the spectrum from a "tech bro" but I still got called one simply because NodeBB federated and dared to serve that content online (nevermind that every other fedi server does the same). In that scenario there was nothing I could do as an individual except wait for an instance mod to lay some facts out. Anything I said was instantly derided, even if it was the same thing. So if I reply with courtesy and I get back vitriol, why do I bother? I don't now. So maybe that's more tech bro-y.

fedicon@techhub.social reiver@mastodon.social what does the AYBABTU reference mean in relation to AP? I suppose I will have to wait for atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org to explain...

deadsuperhero@social.wedistribute.org I'm of the opinion that a solid collection of links is the easiest way to get there. FediDevs set out to do that but I think the best approach would be to update ActivityPub.rocks with the links and docs instead. Join the WG for it!! Led by evan@cosocial.ca and j12t@j12t.social

Thanks! It's something that I personally feel is more performant and future proof for other important things like private discussions (which Mastodon also doesn't support natively yet — mention spamming doesn't count.)

NodeBB is gearing up for a major release this month that brings full two way federation and content discoverability to forums as well! We've been working on it all last year! @activitypub