blenderdumbass@mastodon.online why does this article keep showing up with a newer timestamp?

reiver@mastodon.social I saw that too! I debated messaging Sean with reactions to the talk, live, but thought that would be unprofessional

reiver@mastodon.social woo! Keep it up!

rolle@mementomori.social I'm sorry this happened to you. It's so easy to hurl hurtful accusations with no accountability that one ought to treat them as you would treat drive by criticisms. I'm pretty far down the spectrum from a "tech bro" but I still got called one simply because NodeBB federated and dared to serve that content online (nevermind that every other fedi server does the same). In that scenario there was nothing I could do as an individual except wait for an instance mod to lay some facts out. Anything I said was instantly derided, even if it was the same thing. So if I reply with courtesy and I get back vitriol, why do I bother? I don't now. So maybe that's more tech bro-y.

_elena@mastodon.social should we organize a viewing on Day 2 of FediCon? reiver@mastodon.social

Thanks! It's something that I personally feel is more performant and future proof for other important things like private discussions (which Mastodon also doesn't support natively yet — mention spamming doesn't count.)

I think the FEP process is overly complicated for what it is, but it's definitely helpful if you have multiple implementors on board. The easiest (but least accessible) solution is to document something on your own site, but that lacks the social proof that a finalized FEP has. Just some food for thought I'm looking to create an FEP for cross posting and would love to get the entire threadiverse dev community involved.

NodeBB is gearing up for a major release this month that brings full two way federation and content discoverability to forums as well! We've been working on it all last year! @activitypub