@puppygirlhornypost2@transfem.social not all fedi software, some are rather sane and don't require you to cache the internet

@deadsuperhero@social.wedistribute.org makes me wonder if we could collaborate as a group on marketing copy. If we all aligned on the same copy that would be a good step.

This post did not contain any content.

@jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net I disagree, the solution to an issue list growing faster than the project's capability to handle them, is not "the devs should work harder". In the OSS world, the devs need to be paid more, the project needs more funding, or perhaps the project might need help organizationally. Almost always our stale issues require refactors that change the calculus of work vs reward. We will not refactor entire systems to fix small UI workflow bugs, for example. Also, PRs welcome 🥲

@Kichae said in Organizing the many worlds you're part of through NodeBB: > But man, do I ever desperately want the bulletin board experience in /world. It really feels like what the fediverse was always meant to be, to me. I've been inspired by some teaser images from @johnonolan@mastodon.xyz's Ghost blog, which physically segregates microblogging content apart from long-form content (e.g. blogs). Forum topics fit somewhere in the middle, although since title and body are present we tend to align more with long-form content. It's a really neat idea I'd like to play around with more.

@rwg@aoir.social, @reynir@social.data.coop has it right probably. They're running older versions that haven't upgraded yet... which is a great reason to nag them to upgrade Which site was it, just out of curiosity?

@johnonolan@mastodon.xyz no worries, and thanks! Will do.