Skip to content

ActivityPub for forums looks neat!

Uncategorized
2 2 60

Diese Artikel könnten Dich auch interessieren.

  • Federated Social Media with Topic-Based Following and Blocking?

    Uncategorized fediverse
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    pumpkindrama@reddthat.com NodeBB supports topic based following, because it's a forum and that's literally how it was done way back then. You can follow tags as well.
  • Communities not existing on all instances is a big problem.

    Fediverse fediverse
    23
    0 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    25 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Yes. When the reply is posted to C, it is sent to A. A then sends as:Announce to C, as well as any other communities that follow it. B seems to be irrelevant here.
  • Voting in the threadiverse

    Uncategorized fediverse
    18
    1
    0 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    snoopy@jlai.lu personally, since I create AP enabled software I am on the side of votes being public data. We already have enough issues with votes being out of sync with each other. Mixing in private voting is just asking for trouble. Emoji reactions are neat, although niche to those softwares that utilise it. They allow for greater expression which is nice. They're useless for deriving value (for ranking purposes) unless you assign value to them.
  • UPDATE: That only took a minute after my toot!

    Uncategorized peertube framasoft fediverse
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ
    Yeeeeeeaaahhh! €55k done, let's max it out in the next 30 hours Peertube is going places!
  • Bounce Helps You Switch Networks

    Fediverse fediverse
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey deadsuperhero@lemmy.world have you tried updating to the latest NodeBB? You can post to Lemmy communities from there too!
  • Pleroma Webfinger compatibility

    ActivityPub activitypub pleroma webfinger
    10
    0 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    92 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    trwnh@mastodon.social before, I was not sending Accept at all, now I am sending application/jrd+json.
  • 0 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    158 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey rimu@piefed.social thanks for responding (and sorry for the late reply!) I am not married to the Announce([Article|Note|Page]) approach, so I am definitely open to Create([Article|Note|Page]) with a back-reference. I think I went the former direction because there is a known fallback mechanism — the Announce is treated as a share/boost/repost as normal. However, sending the Create also is fine I think. However, do we need a backreference? In my limited research, it seems that Piefed, et al. picks the first Group actor and associates the post with that community. If I sent over a Create(Article) with two Group actors addressed, could Piefed associate the post with the first, and initiate a cross-post with the remaining Group actors? Secondly, is how to handle sync. 1b12 relies on communities having reciprocal followers in order for two-way synchronization to be established. On my end since I know it is cross-posted I will now send 1b12 activities to cross-posted communities, but can Piefed, et al. send 1b12 activities back as well, in the absence of followers? cc andrew_s@piefed.social nutomic@lemmy.ml melroy@kbin.melroy.org bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de
  • 1 Stimmen
    116 Beiträge
    830 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @willi@social.tchncs.de a VPS can be had from DigitalOcean or Vultr quite economically (although I know that isn't always the case in some countries) You can also use our referral link for an account credit too!