Skip to content

Automatic category/community assignment on received object

ActivityPub
9 3 74

Diese Artikel könnten Dich auch interessieren.

  • 0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    deadsuperhero@social.wedistribute.org I'm of the opinion that a solid collection of links is the easiest way to get there. FediDevs set out to do that but I think the best approach would be to update ActivityPub.rocks with the links and docs instead. Join the WG for it!! Led by evan@cosocial.ca and j12t@j12t.social
  • 0 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    smallcircles@social.coop if you're not able to consume dev discussions on the fediverse and have to continually rely on people creating content on your platform then you need to raise that as an issue on your platform software.
  • What resources would you recommend for getting into #activitypub

    Uncategorized activitypub
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    douginamug@mastodon.xyz this entire series right here https://seb.jambor.dev/posts/understanding-activitypub/
  • Here's an idea.

    Uncategorized activitypub
    7
    0 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    benpate@mastodon.social Emissary interested? Har Har Har
  • 0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    silverpill@mitra.social I wasn't aware that there were sections pertaining to context. I'll have to review more closely.
  • Just for fun...

    Uncategorized activitypub
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    steve@social.technoetic.com only 19/20, I am disappoint. [image: 1752346993311-1000010307.png]
  • 0 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    165 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey rimu@piefed.social thanks for responding (and sorry for the late reply!) I am not married to the Announce([Article|Note|Page]) approach, so I am definitely open to Create([Article|Note|Page]) with a back-reference. I think I went the former direction because there is a known fallback mechanism — the Announce is treated as a share/boost/repost as normal. However, sending the Create also is fine I think. However, do we need a backreference? In my limited research, it seems that Piefed, et al. picks the first Group actor and associates the post with that community. If I sent over a Create(Article) with two Group actors addressed, could Piefed associate the post with the first, and initiate a cross-post with the remaining Group actors? Secondly, is how to handle sync. 1b12 relies on communities having reciprocal followers in order for two-way synchronization to be established. On my end since I know it is cross-posted I will now send 1b12 activities to cross-posted communities, but can Piefed, et al. send 1b12 activities back as well, in the absence of followers? cc andrew_s@piefed.social nutomic@lemmy.ml melroy@kbin.melroy.org bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de
  • Test Post for @julian

    Uncategorized activitypub
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    92 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Uups, next try https://nrw.social/deck/@FrankM/113606591981853331