flamingos@feddit.uk it's less that and more Lemmy's ridiculously effective synchronization mechanic that Mastodon doesn't utilise!

Better and better every day... Hoping we can get some additional funding to really accelerate development!

Less than 3M activities behind now!

@julian What did you do to get 3M activities? I'd like to try that too

silverpill@mitra.social simple! Respond to a Lemmy server with a 500, and once you hit 40 in one day the instance puts you on a timeout. Repeat as needed until your backlog is 4M activities

In my case I had a spam protection measure that limited the amount of upvotes per user in one day. Someone on a Lemmy server uploaded past that threshold and NodeBB started sending back 500s.

@julian But shouldn't it respond with something like 429 "Too Many Requests"?

Who makes decisions on which features get implemented next?

I'm scared to contribute to any projects because I doubt my work would be utilized. I'm wondering if there's a schedule or something I can look at, and prepare for upcoming work? or, how do people get involved

aslakr@mastodon.social it should, yes! The immediate fix was to change the logic so a 200 is sent, but a 429 should work quite well as Lemmy will likely send it back into the delivery queue and (more importantly) not mark it as an error.

Depends on the project, and I imagine a lot of the smaller ones are your standard FOSS BDFL leadership.

In my case I'll likely make a rough milestone list based off our NLNet memorandum and go from there.