Skip to content

As someone who has developed several #ActivityPub software implementations ([Fedify], [Hollo], [BotKit], and [Hackers' Pub]), I believe one of the most frustrating features to implement in the #fediverse is #custom_emoji.

Uncategorized
43 9 0

Diese Artikel könnten Dich auch interessieren.

  • FEP-9098: Custom emojis has been published.

    Uncategorized activitypub fep
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    silverpill@mitra.social I thought the plural of Emoji was Emoji
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    silverpill@mitra.social I wasn't aware that there were sections pertaining to context. I'll have to review more closely.
  • UPDATE: That only took a minute after my toot!

    Uncategorized peertube framasoft fediverse
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ
    Yeeeeeeaaahhh! €55k done, let's max it out in the next 30 hours Peertube is going places!
  • Why is data congregation so hard on Mastodon?

    Fediverse fediverse
    9
    0 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Thanks! It's something that I personally feel is more performant and future proof for other important things like private discussions (which Mastodon also doesn't support natively yet — mention spamming doesn't count.)
  • Bounce Helps You Switch Networks

    Fediverse fediverse
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey deadsuperhero@lemmy.world have you tried updating to the latest NodeBB? You can post to Lemmy communities from there too!
  • Missing project?

    Uncategorized fediverse
    11
    0 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    58 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    m_f@discuss.online not directly, but there was a session at FediForum on Thursday that discussed the website and next steps for updating it. It's been stagnant for quite awhile but evan@cosocial.ca and j12t@j12t.social finally have write access to the repo and control of the domain.
  • 0 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    153 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey rimu@piefed.social thanks for responding (and sorry for the late reply!) I am not married to the Announce([Article|Note|Page]) approach, so I am definitely open to Create([Article|Note|Page]) with a back-reference. I think I went the former direction because there is a known fallback mechanism — the Announce is treated as a share/boost/repost as normal. However, sending the Create also is fine I think. However, do we need a backreference? In my limited research, it seems that Piefed, et al. picks the first Group actor and associates the post with that community. If I sent over a Create(Article) with two Group actors addressed, could Piefed associate the post with the first, and initiate a cross-post with the remaining Group actors? Secondly, is how to handle sync. 1b12 relies on communities having reciprocal followers in order for two-way synchronization to be established. On my end since I know it is cross-posted I will now send 1b12 activities to cross-posted communities, but can Piefed, et al. send 1b12 activities back as well, in the absence of followers? cc andrew_s@piefed.social nutomic@lemmy.ml melroy@kbin.melroy.org bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de