phillycodehound@indieweb.social yeah, organized by reiver@mastodon.social .. Details are scant for now but I'm sure we'll learn more soon!

silverpill@mitra.social said: > If the OP is the single source of truth, they can moderate the entire conversation (represented by context collection: Streams). If not, then each reply is independent and authors moderate only the direct replies (represented by replies collections: GoToSocial). That is a good point. The approaches are broadly compatible when top-down moderation by the context owner is not assumed. In a moderated scenario, crawling the reply tree would not be useful unless paired with some sort of "is member of" validation with the context owner... at which point the served collection would be more performant. It could be useful for discovery by the context owner itself though.

quillmatiq@mastodon.social yeah I think I will be! Thanks reiver@mastodon.social for organizing

nutomic@lemmy.ml let me know if I got any of the details wrong. Much thanks to your team for the assist in debugging!

thisismissem@hachyderm.io oh god do I have to handle this too

silverpill@mitra.social I thought about checking against the outbox, but there's a potential race condition that could occur if I receive the Create(Note) at roughly the same time as the community, but the community hasn't processed the activity yet. In that scenario, the activity would not be in the outbox for checking. The same thing would happen if there was some out-of-band check for object membership in a collection (not that there is one right now).

Uups, next try https://nrw.social/deck/@FrankM/113606591981853331

Kommt echt an Ich bin verblüfft LOL