Skip to content

As someone who has developed several #ActivityPub software implementations ([Fedify], [Hollo], [BotKit], and [Hackers' Pub]), I believe one of the most frustrating features to implement in the #fediverse is #custom_emoji.

Uncategorized
43 9 69

Diese Artikel könnten Dich auch interessieren.

  • Come see @atomicpoet host his panel at FediCon

    Uncategorized fedicon fedicon2025 fediverse
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    fedicon@techhub.social reiver@mastodon.social what does the AYBABTU reference mean in relation to AP? I suppose I will have to wait for atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org to explain...
  • What resources would you recommend for getting into #activitypub

    Uncategorized activitypub
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    douginamug@mastodon.xyz this entire series right here https://seb.jambor.dev/posts/understanding-activitypub/
  • Here's an idea.

    Uncategorized activitypub
    7
    0 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    benpate@mastodon.social Emissary interested? Har Har Har
  • 0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    silverpill@mitra.social I wasn't aware that there were sections pertaining to context. I'll have to review more closely.
  • Bounce Helps You Switch Networks

    Fediverse fediverse
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey deadsuperhero@lemmy.world have you tried updating to the latest NodeBB? You can post to Lemmy communities from there too!
  • 0 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    174 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey rimu@piefed.social thanks for responding (and sorry for the late reply!) I am not married to the Announce([Article|Note|Page]) approach, so I am definitely open to Create([Article|Note|Page]) with a back-reference. I think I went the former direction because there is a known fallback mechanism — the Announce is treated as a share/boost/repost as normal. However, sending the Create also is fine I think. However, do we need a backreference? In my limited research, it seems that Piefed, et al. picks the first Group actor and associates the post with that community. If I sent over a Create(Article) with two Group actors addressed, could Piefed associate the post with the first, and initiate a cross-post with the remaining Group actors? Secondly, is how to handle sync. 1b12 relies on communities having reciprocal followers in order for two-way synchronization to be established. On my end since I know it is cross-posted I will now send 1b12 activities to cross-posted communities, but can Piefed, et al. send 1b12 activities back as well, in the absence of followers? cc andrew_s@piefed.social nutomic@lemmy.ml melroy@kbin.melroy.org bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de
  • Post flair in PieFed

    Fediverse fediverse
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    50 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    I think the FEP process is overly complicated for what it is, but it's definitely helpful if you have multiple implementors on board. The easiest (but least accessible) solution is to document something on your own site, but that lacks the social proof that a finalized FEP has. Just some food for thought I'm looking to create an FEP for cross posting and would love to get the entire threadiverse dev community involved.
  • Test Post for @julian

    Uncategorized activitypub
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    99 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Uups, next try https://nrw.social/deck/@FrankM/113606591981853331