Skip to content

Ich muss hier mal wieder spammen für einen Test mit #ActivityPub und #NodeBB

Uncategorized
2 2 56

Diese Artikel könnten Dich auch interessieren.

  • 0 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @evan@cosocial.ca hmm. I agree in the sense that any combination of recipients can be addressed, but the specific term "follower only" (to the exclusion of the public pseudo-user) isn't AP specific... could be wrong on that one. Either way I do think it's a good courtesy to assume equal or narrower visibility when replying to any post. The specific issue you outlined in OP seems to be a Mastodon bug for sure.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Updates to the world page

    Uncategorized nodebbactivityp nodebb
    32
    2
    0 Stimmen
    32 Beiträge
    121 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @projectmoon@forum.agnos.is said in Updates to the world page: > > > Also, are there plans to merge the federation synchronization and new remote category following stuff together into one cohesive set of functionality? Yes... the remote category functionality supercedes the category sync functionality in some ways, but there is still a use case for it. Most likely I will need to develop proper support for cross-posting (at least locally), and that would work well with the remote category functionality, so that topics are cross-posted to the synchronized category, instead of moved.
  • Live testing of remote categories

    Uncategorized activitypub nodebbactivityp
    63
    2
    0 Stimmen
    63 Beiträge
    266 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @pfefferle@mastodon.social just wanted to poke you about this issue again. The latest updates to NodeBB now do a webfinger backcheck to ensure that the actor has a valid webfinger entry for their purported handle. If it does not, then the user is not properly created. Mastodon also does this. This check is probably for security as well as for preventing handle collisions. The multilingual plugin in conjunction with the ActivityPub plugin creates users that share the same handle, and that causes issues with federated content. For example, this article by @jonvt@vivaldi.com will load up just fine in Mastodon, but this japanese article by @akira@vivaldi.com will not, because that second article's attributedTo is https://vivaldi.com/ja/?author=176, which fails that check (the author's ID is actually https://vivaldi.com?author=176 as per the handle backcheck) cc @AltCode
  • 1 Stimmen
    116 Beiträge
    496 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @willi@social.tchncs.de a VPS can be had from DigitalOcean or Vultr quite economically (although I know that isn't always the case in some countries) You can also use our referral link for an account credit too!
  • ActivityPub for forums looks neat!

    Uncategorized activitypub federation discourse fediverse
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    NodeBB is gearing up for a major release this month that brings full two way federation and content discoverability to forums as well! We've been working on it all last year! @activitypub
  • Test Post for @julian

    Uncategorized activitypub
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    66 Aufrufe
    FrankMF
    Uups, next try https://nrw.social/deck/@FrankM/113606591981853331
  • Reconciling ActivityPub Deletes with NodeBB deletion

    Uncategorized activitypub
    16
    0 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    61 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Angus, while I haven't made the appropriate changes to NodeBB's implementation yet, I did draft an FEP including the changes we discussed. https://github.com/julianlam/feps/blob/main/fep/15c5/fep-15c5.md It is not PR'd upstream yet, but I will do so in the coming days unless there are some concerns.