Skip to content

Blogtastisch: 2. Blogs und das Fediverse

notizBlog
17 8 182

Diese Artikel könnten Dich auch interessieren.

  • what fediverse software is similar to lemmy?

    Uncategorized fediverse
    7
    0 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    There's NodeBB if you want a forum/BBS style UX for the threadiverse!
  • 0 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    59 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    renchap@oisaur.com edent@mastodon.social as it should, as the followers collection can be gamed and should not be trusted.
  • 0 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    For what it's worth your blog does show up fine in NodeBB as well. Perhaps you are missing the @context property and so Mastodon is refusing to parse it?
  • Missing project?

    Uncategorized fediverse
    11
    0 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    57 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    m_f@discuss.online not directly, but there was a session at FediForum on Thursday that discussed the website and next steps for updating it. It's been stagnant for quite awhile but evan@cosocial.ca and j12t@j12t.social finally have write access to the repo and control of the domain.
  • Pixelfed Uptick in Monthly Active Users

    Uncategorized fediverse
    20
    1
    0 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    83 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    I would say that Pixelfed is closer to the microblog space than it is the threaded discussion space. It's essentially microblogging except with an image media focus (or video, in the case of Loops.) To each their own, some people communicate better using pictures, some better over short text, some better over long-form text. There's a space for them all
  • #activitypub #mastodev

    Uncategorized activitypub mastodev
    3
    1
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    thisismissem@hachyderm.io oh god do I have to handle this too
  • 0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    50 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    melroy@kbin.melroy.org oh sorry to hear that hopefully Dan hasn't moved on from FediDB already.
  • 0 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    149 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey rimu@piefed.social thanks for responding (and sorry for the late reply!) I am not married to the Announce([Article|Note|Page]) approach, so I am definitely open to Create([Article|Note|Page]) with a back-reference. I think I went the former direction because there is a known fallback mechanism — the Announce is treated as a share/boost/repost as normal. However, sending the Create also is fine I think. However, do we need a backreference? In my limited research, it seems that Piefed, et al. picks the first Group actor and associates the post with that community. If I sent over a Create(Article) with two Group actors addressed, could Piefed associate the post with the first, and initiate a cross-post with the remaining Group actors? Secondly, is how to handle sync. 1b12 relies on communities having reciprocal followers in order for two-way synchronization to be established. On my end since I know it is cross-posted I will now send 1b12 activities to cross-posted communities, but can Piefed, et al. send 1b12 activities back as well, in the absence of followers? cc andrew_s@piefed.social nutomic@lemmy.ml melroy@kbin.melroy.org bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de