lucas3d@mastodon.social that looks fun! Was it just a social event?

deadsuperhero@social.wedistribute.org I'm of the opinion that a solid collection of links is the easiest way to get there. FediDevs set out to do that but I think the best approach would be to update ActivityPub.rocks with the links and docs instead. Join the WG for it!! Led by evan@cosocial.ca and j12t@j12t.social

jdt@enigmatick.social could it be a mistake in the reply? For example, if the reply had all of the mentions removed I would think Mastodon would send out an object with empty to and cc.

douginamug@mastodon.xyz this entire series right here https://seb.jambor.dev/posts/understanding-activitypub/

> Getting a critical mass of people to create yet another account was always a major obstacle. I see and have experienced this effect time and time again, and we're getting closer and closer to the point where the protocol implementations can abstract away the messy bits. Gaining critical mass among devs is the first step!

silverpill@mitra.social I wasn't aware that there were sections pertaining to context. I'll have to review more closely.

liaizon@social.wake.st are the long emoji horizontal or vertical? The former is easier to support (setting just a max height), but the latter has concerns re: line height. cc silverpill@mitra.social

Uups, next try https://nrw.social/deck/@FrankM/113606591981853331