If LLM/AI companies could maybe stop DDoS-ing git forges from open-source communities for five minutes, that would be just amazing.
-
schrieb vor 6 Tagen zuletzt editiert von
If LLM/AI companies could maybe stop DDoS-ing git forges from open-source communities for five minutes, that would be just amazing.
-
If LLM/AI companies could maybe stop DDoS-ing git forges from open-source communities for five minutes, that would be just amazing.
schrieb vor 6 Tagen zuletzt editiert vonDrew DeVault put it nicely https://drewdevault.com/2025/03/17/2025-03-17-Stop-externalizing-your-costs-on-me.html
-
If LLM/AI companies could maybe stop DDoS-ing git forges from open-source communities for five minutes, that would be just amazing.
-
@carl we literally had to put a proof-of-work reverse proxy in front of the GNOME gitlab instance to mitigate AI scrapers leaving about 10% of the available resources to the people actually using gitlab. It's a disaster.
schrieb vor 6 Tagen zuletzt editiert von@ebassi May I ask you for some details and numbers about this? I'd like to write an article about this problem!
-
@carl we literally had to put a proof-of-work reverse proxy in front of the GNOME gitlab instance to mitigate AI scrapers leaving about 10% of the available resources to the people actually using gitlab. It's a disaster.
schrieb vor 6 Tagen zuletzt editiert von -
@ebassi May I ask you for some details and numbers about this? I'd like to write an article about this problem!
schrieb vor 6 Tagen zuletzt editiert von@niccolove you want to talk to @barthalion who does the system administration of the GNOME infrastructure; he'll be able to give you more precise numbers
-
@niccolove you want to talk to @barthalion who does the system administration of the GNOME infrastructure; he'll be able to give you more precise numbers
schrieb vor 5 Tagen zuletzt editiert von@ebassi @niccolove I don't think I can share any hard numbers off-hand. The tangible change is that the number of webservice pods for our GitLab instance went down from the maximum 6 to the minimum 3, while becoming more responsive to what users are doing. People can also run `git clone/pull/push` and expect it will finish relatively quickly instead of getting errors.
The logs I'm looking at right now are ephemeral and the earliest line starts today at 17:34 UTC and ends about now. Anubis explicitly denied 81366 clients (bots and abusive scrappers with recognizable user-agent patterns), while 2690 clients passed the proof of work challenge. That's only the last 2.5 hours!
For anything more I would need to dive into our log collection system, and I'm afraid I don't have much time for that.
-
-
Drew DeVault put it nicely https://drewdevault.com/2025/03/17/2025-03-17-Stop-externalizing-your-costs-on-me.html
schrieb vor 5 Tagen zuletzt editiert vonAnd nice summary from @niccolove about the current situation https://thelibre.news/foss-infrastructure-is-under-attack-by-ai-companies/
-
schrieb vor 4 Tagen zuletzt editiert von
@Conan_Kudo @ebassi @carl is there a blog post explaining this? I'm collecting resources on what seems to be a global abuse trend, in the context of @forgejo
Crawlers hitting Forgejo instances - global abuse trend
discussions - Discussions related to Forgejo
Forgejo: Beyond coding. We Forge. (codeberg.org)
-
@Conan_Kudo @ebassi @carl is there a blog post explaining this? I'm collecting resources on what seems to be a global abuse trend, in the context of @forgejo
Crawlers hitting Forgejo instances - global abuse trend
discussions - Discussions related to Forgejo
Forgejo: Beyond coding. We Forge. (codeberg.org)
schrieb vor 4 Tagen zuletzt editiert vonDieser Beitrag wurde gelöscht!